When it comes to managing your superannuation, one of the most common debates is whether to opt for passive or active super funds. Both strategies have their pros and cons, but does one outperform the other over time? And how do key asset allocations such as property, private equity (PE), infrastructure, credit, and alternatives impact overall returns?
In this post, I’ll break down the data comparing passive vs active super funds from top providers in Australia, focusing on the “balanced” segment, which typically involves 70-75% allocated toward growth assets. I’ll also dive into how asset allocation may impact returns and contribute to both short-term and long-term growth.
TL:DR
- ART (Australian Retirement Trust) consistently outperforms with their active strategy, likely due to strong expertise in property, credit, private equity (PE), infrastructure, and alternative assets.
- Short-term performance (1-5 years) strongly favors passive funds, driven by larger exposure to both domestic and international stocks.
- Long-term returns (10 years) show that active funds catch up. This highlights the importance of asset allocation. My hypothesis is that this is due to the higher allocation to property and infrastructure. However, private equity and alternatives show more mixed results.
Passive vs. Active Super Funds: The Performance Breakdown
Here’s a quick snapshot comparing passive vs active super funds over different time periods
- 1 Year: 9 out of 10 passive funds outperformed their active counterparts.
- 3 Years: 8 out of 9 passive funds outperformed their active counterparts.
- 5 Years: 5 out of 6 passive funds outperformed their active counterparts.
- 10 Years: 4 out of 5 active funds performed better!
Short-Term (1-5 Years): Passive Funds Lead the Way
In the short term, passive funds tend to outperform their active counterparts. But why is this the case?
- Domestic & International stocks: Passive funds typically allocate a higher percentage to stocks, in particular international equities which have been performing strongly in recent years. This larger exposure provides them with an edge in the short run.
- Asset allocation drag: Active funds, on the other hand, often allocate capital toward other assets like property, credit, infrastructure, PE and alternatives. While these assets may offer long-term benefits, they can be a drag on short-term returns. Their performance is also highly dependent on the skill of the fund manager to select the right deals.
Long-Term (10 Years): Active Funds Catch Up
Looking at the 10 years performance, we start to see a shift. Active funds with the ability to allocate more to property, infrastructure and credit tend to perform better in the long run. However, it’s important to note that this doesn’t always mean these funds are actually allocating more toward these assets. Additionally, while most funds have allocation towards PE and alternative assets, the ability to allocate higher did not correlate to the fund’s return. It is not too surprising given PE and alternatives can be more volatile and difficult to value.
The Verdict: Go Passive or Active?
- For short-term gains (1-5 years), passive funds are the clear winner. At present, their larger exposure to stocks and lower management costs help them outperform in the short run.
- For long-term growth (10 years), my hypothesis is that active funds that allocate wisely to infrastructure, property, and credit tend to outperform. The skill of the active fund manager in selecting the right deals and timing the market is key.
If you’re interested in a fee comparison I did previously, check it out here: Super Fund Fee Comparison
Thanks for reading, cheers!
Disclaimer:
Please note that the observations and conclusions in this post are based on my personal analysis of the data. This is not financial advice. The content provided here does not constitute professional, personal financial, or financial recommendations. You should conduct your own research and seek independent legal, financial, or taxation advice to understand how the information may apply to your unique circumstances.
Comparing the Performance between Passive VS Active Strategies on “Balanced”
Name | Option | 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 10 years | Active/Passive? | Period Ending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia Super | Indexed Diversified 70% | 11.51% | 5.46% | 6.98% | 7.23% | Passive | June 24 |
Australia Super | Balanced 75% | 8.46% | 4.51% | 6.68% | 8.07% | Active | June 24 |
Aware Super | Balanced Index 75% | 12.25% | N/A | N/A | N/A | Passive | Feb 25 |
Aware Super | Balanced 75% | 10.22% | 7.08% | 7.47% | 7.22% | Active | Feb 25 |
Hostplus | Balanced Index 75% | 11.74% | 8.76% | 8.41% | 7.24% | Passive | Feb 25 |
Hostplus | Balanced 75% | 9.62% | 6.50% | 7.64% | 8.04% | Active | Feb 25 |
HESTA | Indexed Balanced Growth 75% | 10.97% | 8.28% | N/A | N/A | Passive | Feb 25 |
HESTA | Balanced Growth 68% | 9.76% | 7.31% | 7.67% | 7.37% | Active | Feb 25 |
Cbus | Indexed Diversified 75% | 10.86% | 7.74% | N/A | N/A | Passive | Feb 25 |
Cbus | Growth 75% | 9.17% | 6.62% | 7.12% | 7.46% | Active | Feb 25 |
Colonial First State | Indexed Balanced 70% | 10.37% | 6.16% | N/A | N/A | Passive | Feb 25 |
Colonial First State | Balanced 70% | 9.87% | 5.86% | 6.06% | 5.47% | Active | Feb 25 |
MLC Super Fund | Low Cost Balanced 72% | 10.90% | 7.30% | 7.10% | 6.30% | Passive | Feb 25 |
MLC Super Fund | MLC Balanced 74% | 9.20% | 6.00% | 6.90% | 6.40% | Active | Feb 25 |
AMP Super | Balanced Indexed 75% | 11.71% | 6.91% | 6.44% | 5.76% | Passive | Feb 25 |
AMP Super | Future Directions Balanced X% | 10.65% | 5.82% | 6% | 5.72% | Active | Feb 25 |
Australian Retirement Trust | Balanced Index 75% | 5.57% | 6.22% | 9.44% | 6.46% | Passive | Mar 25 |
Australian Retirement Trust | Balanced 70% | 6.12% | 6.89% | 10.26% | 7.64% | Active | Mar 25 |
REST | Balanced Index 75% | 6.68% | 6.66% | 10.65% | N/A | Passive | Mar 25 |
REST | Growth/Core 75% | 6.19% | 5.91% | 8.90% | 6.40% | Active | Mar 25 |
Asset Allocation Framework for Top Superfunds
Name | Option | AU Shares | International Shares | Fixed Interest | Cash | Property | Credit | PE | Infrastructure | Alternatives | Other | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia Super | Indexed Diversified 70% | Y (20-50%) | Y (20-50%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-30%) | |||||||
Australia Super | Balanced 75% | Y (10-45%) | Y (10-45%) | Y (0-25%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-5%) | ||
Australian Retirement Trust | Balanced Index 75% | Y (0-50%) | Y (20-60%) | Y (0-40%) | Y (0-20%) | |||||||
Australian Retirement Trust | Balanced 70% | Y (20-50%) | Y (20-50%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-25%) | Y (0-10%) | ||
Aware Super | Balanced Index 75% | Y (20-40%) | Y (35-55%) | Y (0-33%) | Y (0-45%) | Y (0-10%) | ||||||
Aware Super | Balanced 75% | Y (12-32%) | Y (23-43%) | Y (0-25%) | Y (0-45%) | Y (0-27%) | Y (0-25%) | Y (0-26%) | Y (0-32%) | Y (0-31%)* | *Alternatives is split between growth/defensive at 0-21%/10% max respectively | |
Hostplus | Balanced Index 75% | Y (20-60%) | Y (20-60%)* | Y (10-30%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (0-10%) | *International shares split between developed markets 20-60% and EM 0-15% | |
Hostplus | Balanced 75% | Y (10-40%) | Y (10-55%)* | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-25%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-20%) | *International shares split between developed markets 10-40% and EM 0-15% | |
REST | Balanced Index 75% | Y (30%) | Y (45%) | Y (20%) | Y (5%) | |||||||
REST | Growth/Core 75% | Y (15-30%) | Y (30-40%) | Y (5-25%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (5-15%) | Y (5-20%) | Y (0-10%) | ||||
HESTA | Indexed Balanced Growth 75% | Y (25-40%) | Y (35-50%) | Y (15-25%) | Y (0-10%) | * | *Credit is included in Fixed Interest | |||||
HESTA | Balanced Growth 68% | Y (15-40%) | Y (15-45%) | Y (0-35%) | Y (0-30%) | Y (0-20%) | * | Y (0-15%) | Y (5-25%) | Y (0-15%) | *Credit is included in Fixed Interest | |
Cbus | Indexed Diversified 75% | Y (15-55%) | Y (20-60%) | Y (0-40%) | Y (1-40%) | |||||||
Cbus | Growth 75% | Y (5-38%) | Y (7-55.5%)* | Y (0-23%) | Y (1-18%) | Y (0-28%) | Y (0-17%) | Y (0-12%) | Y (0-28%) | Y (0-13%) | *Global shares 7-39%, Emerging market shares 0-16.5% | |
Colonial First State | Indexed Balanced 70% | Y (15-35%) | Y (25-45%) | Y (15-30%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-15%) | |||||
Colonial First State | Balanced 70% | Y (10-30%) | Y (25-45%) | Y (15-30%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (5-25%) | * | Y (5-25%) | Y (5-25%) | *Credit is included in Fixed Interest | ||
MLC Super Fund | Low Cost Balanced 72% | Y (15-40%) | Y (20-50%) | Y (5-40%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-10%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-15%) | |||
MLC Super Fund | MLC Balanced 74% | Y (10-40%) | Y (15-45%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-20%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (5-20%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-15%) | Y (0-15%) | ||
AMP Super | Balanced Indexed 75% | Y (11-41%) | Y (17-55%) | Y (1-80%)* | Y (1-80%)* | Y (0-22%) | Y (0-17%) | Y (0-15%) | *Fixed income and cash together can equate to 1-80% | |||
AMP Super | Future Directions Balanced X% | Y (11-41%) | Y (14-62%) | Y (0-78%)* | Y (0-78%)* | Y (0-24%) | Y (3-25%) | Y (0-15%) | *Fixed income and cash together can equate to 1-80% |